除上述谬论外，还有“环境破坏论”、“经济掠夺论”、“新殖民主义论”等论调，不一而足。中国真诚欢迎各方提出建设性意见，把共建‘一带一路’做得更好。但这些歪理邪说罔顾事实，打着深度报道、专业分析的幌子，通过偷换概念、移花接木的伎俩，编造貌似合理的逻辑混淆视听，蒙蔽普通民众，根本经不起推敲。

　　下面，我再谈谈加企业在“一带一路”建设中面临什么样的机遇。我认为，对加企业而言，以更积极姿态参与“一带一路”建设正当其时，机不可失。当前，加南方盟友正顽固推进贸易保护主义，肆意挥舞贸易战大棒，既严重冲击了基于规则的国际经济秩序，也导致加美贸易摩擦升级，加成为主要受害者之一。这也引发加国内对贸易政策的反思。我注意到，有些加专家、学者提出，加强硬回击美贸易保护主义措施徒劳无益，应向美妥协，换取美高抬贵手。这种建议只是治标之策，绝非长久之计。诚然，美是加最大贸易伙伴，加积极推进同美经贸合作在情理之中。但如果从全球经济重心不断向亚太转移的大势看，从维护加经济社会发展的现实和长远利益看，加可以不离开美国市场，但必须去成长正在发生的地方，推进贸易多元化才是正道。加政府近期改组内阁，作出推进贸易多元化的决策，这是明智之举。但贸易多元化说易行难，没有壮士断腕的决心恐难有进展。而“一带一路”倡议恰好为加贸易多元化和扩大对外投资提供了广阔天地。为什么这么说呢？

Apart from the fallacies mentioned above, there are some other accusations, such as "environmental damage", "economic predation", "neo-colonialism", and so on. China sincerely welcomes constructive suggestions from all stakeholders for a better cooperation under the BRI. On the contrary, these fallacies ignore the truth. Under the guise of in-depth reporting and professional analysis, they trump up seemingly reasonable doctrine through the tricks of changing, replacing and substituting concepts and making misinterpretation to confuse and deceive the public. These fallacies bear no scrutiny at all. 

Then, I would like to talk about the opportunities for Canadian enterprises under the Belt and Road Initiative framework. I think there is no better time for Canadian enterprises to participate in the construction of the BRI than now, and they should not let the opportunities slip away. Currently, Canada's southern ally is arbitrarily pursuing protectionism and wielding the stick of trade war, which has not only greatly shook the rules-based international economic order, but also escalated the trade frictions between Canada and the U.S. As a result, Canada has become one of the major victims. That triggered Canada's introspection on trade policies. I have noticed that some Canadian experts and scholars have warned not to fight back the U.S.' trade protectionism in a tough way. Instead, Canada should compromise with the U.S. in exchange for its mercy. Such suggestion is just a temporary expedient rather than a fundamental solution. Indeed, U.S. is Canada's largest trade partner. It is reasonable for Canada to actively promote its economic and trade cooperation with the U.S. However, given the general situation where the global economic center is gradually shifting towards the Asia-Pacific, and in consideration of maintaining Canada's economic and social development as well as long-term interests, Canada can still value the U.S. market, yet it also has to turn to the emerging markets and diversify its trade. In this regard, it is really wise for Canadian government to make the decision to promote trade diversification in the recent cabinet reshuffle. However, it's always easier said than done. The diversification policy requires a tough implementation. Fortunately, the BRI happens to provide a golden chance for Canada to diversify its trade and to expand its foreign investment. Why do I put it in this way?