会员中心 |  会员注册  |  兼职信息发布    浏览手机版!    精选9.9元!    人工翻译    英语IT服务 贫困儿童资助 | 留言板 | 设为首页 | 加入收藏  繁體中文
当前位置:首页 > 翻译理论 > 外事翻译 > 正文

2019年7月10日外交部发言人耿爽主持例行记者会(中英对照)

发布时间: 2019-07-17 09:10:40   作者:译聚网   来源: 外交部   浏览次数:



  我记得上周已经回答过类似问题。关于中美两国元首大阪会晤的情况,中方已经发了消息稿,你可以去查阅,我没有进一步补充的内容。

  关于涉港问题,我们的态度非常明确:香港是中华人民共和国的特别行政区,香港事务纯属中国内政,任何外国政府、组织和个人都无权干预。

I believe I took a similar question last week. Again I'd refer you to the press release issued by the Chinese side on the meeting in Osaka. I have nothing further to add.

Our position on Hong Kong-related issues is very clear. Hong Kong is a special administrative region of the People's Republic of China, and its affairs are purely China's domestic affairs. No foreign government, organization or individual has the right to interfere.

  问:昨天,白宫国家经济委员会主任库德洛表示,中美仍然有可能在谈判中克服分歧,但是目前谈判没有既定时间表。请问这是否意味着中美双方目前的分歧仍然较大?中方对谈判前景怎么看?

  答:关于中美经贸高级别磋商双方牵头人昨天通话的情况,中国商务部已经发了消息,我这里没有进一步可以补充的内容。

  至于谈判具体情况和展望,我建议你去向主管部门询问。

Q: Director of the US National Economic Council Larry Kudlow said yesterday that differences between China and the US could still be overcome in negotiations, but there is no timeline at the moment. Does this mean the two sides still have some major differences? How does China see the prospects of negotiations?

A: China's Ministry of Commerce has already released information on yesterday's telephone call between the heads of China-US trade talks. I have nothing further to add.

As to specifics and outlook on the talks, I'd refer you to the competent authority.

  问:有报道称,驻港解放军司令员上个月同美国官员见面时提出,解放军不会介入香港事务。中方为什么需要对美国官员作出这样的承诺?

  答:我不了解你提到的这场会面的情况。如果你感兴趣,可以向中国国防部询问。

Q: It has been reported that the Commander of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Garrison in the Hong Kong SAR said when meeting with a US official last month that the PLA would not interfere in Hong Kong affairs. Why does China need to make such a pledge to a US official?

A: I am not aware of the meeting you mentioned. I refer you to the Ministry of National Defense.


微信公众号

[上一页][1] [2] 【欢迎大家踊跃评论】
我来说两句
评分: 1分 2分 3分 4分 5分
评论内容:
验证码:
【网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明本站同意其观点或证实其描述。】
评论列表
已有 0 条评论(查看更多评论)